Artart last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-nvme-05

Reviewer: James Gruessing
Review result: Ready

This is my review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-nvme-05 as part of ARTART Last Call review.

Overall this a short and clear document which I think is ready, however I have
only one question:

In your security considerations there are two normative statements:

>  Physical security is a common means for protocols not based on IP.
>  In environments where the security requirements for the storage
>  protocol cannot be met, pNFS with an NVMe layout SHOULD NOT be
>  deployed.
>   ...
>  In environments where the security requirements are such that client-
>  side protection from access to storage outside of the layout is not
>  sufficient, pNFS with a SCSI layout on a NVMe namespace SHOULD NOT be
>  deployed.

These appear repetitious to RFC 8154, and further are normative statements
required here? Whilst physical security considerations are important, do such
deployment guidance require it?