RE: NGtrans closing procedures

Rod,

At 10:56 AM 10/7/2002 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>Isn't this one expired?  What's the status and/or plans?

It should have, but it is still in the registry, so it will revert to a 
personal ID if it is still there when the secretariat does the change. It 
had been (still is) waiting for comments from the routing folk, but those 
haven't materialized yet. As for plans after the closeout of ngtrans, it 
will depend on other working groups interest in it (IDR, v6ops...).


Bob

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ext Alain Durand [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 1:04 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: Alain Durand; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: (ngtrans) NGtrans closing procedures
>
>Connecting IPv6 Islands across IPv4 Clouds with BGP (BGP-TUNNEL)
>is ngtrans ID
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ngtrans-bgp-tunnel-04.txt>
>becomes personal ID
><http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gastaud-ngtrans-bgp-tunnel-04.txt>