Re: Re: IPv6 only devices in home network

Caitlin Bestler <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:57:33 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ngtrans
Message-ID <r01050300-1015-A1F85D02DEDD11D6A6E7003065D48EE0@[192.168.0.2]>
On 10/13/02, Zhang haofeng wrote:

>So I think it is old issue which has been discussed here
>for such a long time. It's a fact that NATs exist almost
>everywhere in the current ISP network. Maybe Teredo is a
>better solution?
>After all, we need a convenient and not costly way to cope
>with NAT problems during the transition period. 
>
>

My understanding is that Teredo is a solution for home
networks to use *before* their ISP is ready to assign
IPv6 addresses.

The real challenge is to convince ISPs that it is better
to assign IPv6 addresses than private IPv4 addresses.
In either case translation is required to connect with
IPv4-only hosts, but the IPv6 address is public and can
be used to connect with IPv6 hosts without restriction.

Caitlin Bestler
http://asomi.com/CaitlinBestler/