Re: Re: IPv6 only devices in home network
"Michael Cole" <[email protected]> Sun, 20 Oct 2002 0:16:37 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ngtrans |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If General Motors and MIT were to lease out their millions of unused global addresses, then Ipv4 shortages would not be so critical. How the hell is MIT going to use 24 million mumble something addresses anyways. ----- Original Message ----- From: Keith Moore To: Caitlin Bestler Cc: Keith Moore ; [email protected] Sent: 10/17/2002 11:16:31 AM Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 only devices in home network So you would advocate that any ISP without sufficient public IPv4 addresses simply refuse to provide IPv4 connectivity to their customers? If the RIRs are doling out address blocks in such a way that some ISPs can assign static IPs to each customer that has a full-time connection, while others cannot do so, that's a serious problem that needs to be fixed ASAP. But NAT does not provide "IPv4 connectivity" any more than tin cans and string provide a reliable data link. --- Michael Cole --- [email protected] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet.