Re: Re: IPv6 only devices in home network

"Michael Cole" <[email protected]> Sun, 20 Oct 2002 0:16:37 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ngtrans
Message-ID <[email protected]>
If General Motors and MIT were to lease out their millions of 
unused global addresses, then Ipv4 shortages would not be so critical. How the 
hell is MIT going to use 24 million mumble something addresses anyways.


----- Original Message ----- 

From: Keith Moore  

To: Caitlin Bestler 
Cc: Keith Moore ; [email protected] 

Sent: 10/17/2002 11:16:31 AM 

Subject: Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 only 
devices in home network





  So you would advocate that any ISP without sufficient

  public IPv4 addresses simply refuse to provide IPv4

  connectivity to their customers?

 

If the RIRs are doling out address blocks in such a way that some 
ISPs

can assign static IPs to each customer that has a full-time 
connection,

while others cannot do so, that's a serious problem that needs to be 

fixed ASAP.

 

But NAT does not provide "IPv4 connectivity" any more than tin cans

and string provide a reliable data link.

 

 




 

--- Michael Cole

--- [email protected] 

--- EarthLink: It's your Internet.