Re: Why do the 6to4-6bone relays work so badly? Is it possible to use 2002:c058:6301:: with XP?
Pekka Savola <[email protected]> Sat, 2 Nov 2002 15:11:38 +0200 (EET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ngtrans |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Anssi Porttikivi wrote: > I am using XP and I have tried with the default MS relay, > 6to4.ipv6.funet.fi and 6to4.kfu.com and various other relays. I seldom > get to ping to any 3ffe or 2001 addresses. Why? It feels almost like the > public "relays" would just be 6to4 routers with no 6bone connection? Or > is 6bone routing totally screwed up? Or are the IPv6 firewalls stopping > my ICPM packets? The Microsoft implementation makes a ludicrous assumption (that the relay address is 2002:<V4ADDR>::<V4DDR>, note the IID part) which seem to be only true for their relay. Bad for IPv6 but I guess they deserved it. This is outside of the scope of this list, I believe, though. (Oh, this is reported fixed in some newer releases like .NET, no idea myself). > Can I use 2002:c058:6301:: (6to4-6bone relay anycast) with XP? Looks > like not. Setting a relay with > > netsh interface ipv6 6to4 set relay <relay DNS name> > > works fine, which I can verify by looking at the 6to4 default gateway > IPv6 address of ipconfig output, but using a literal > > netsh interface ipv6 6to4 set relay 2002:c058:6301:: > > will fail. > -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords