Re: Re: IPv6 only devices in home network
"Michael Cole"<[email protected]> Tue, 12 Nov 2002 21:05:51 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ngtrans |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Actually, There are 4 reasons why we have to pay more for addresses: 1. The original allocation scheme allocated 16 million plus addresses to each of the original IPv4 participants at essentially zero cost. In the early days, charging 10 cents or even 1 cent per month per address would have been a hardship. That is not true today. 2. Routing had to be simple because early routers were built using the PDP-11. That is no longer an issue. 3. In a lot of cases it takes both a carrot AND a stick to get these people to realize that they can make money hand over fist leasing out their unused addresses. So far, AT&T is one of the few companies that has realized this. 4. If IANA charged a nominal price such as 10 cents per address per month, then those people who do not need 16 million addresses could make $!#%loads of money by leasing out 500,000 of them at $5 per month each. Those companies that really do need a /8 block can easily pay $1.6 million per month. Even if the IANA price were 2 cents per month each we would still have much more equitable distribution. However, we will still need IPv6; when we need it will depend a lot on whether the big guys will lease out their unused addresses. Mike Cole, [email protected] On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:51:56 +0000 Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 07:32:38AM -0800, Randy > Bush wrote: > > > The reason why we have shortages of Ipv4 > addresses > > > > do we have a shortage of v4 ip addresses? > > Perhaps "shortages of globally routable IPv4 > addresses available to end > users in a number of environments", like public > WLANs, home networks, > networks in hotels, or in public events (like > IST2002 where I am now), > etc etc. > > The choice of the operator to ask for and use > global addresses is not > something the end user can control :( I can > vote with my wallet for > my home network (though it's frustrating that > money is required to get more > IPv4 addresses, for whatever reason), but not > so usually when attached to > a public or other network. > > Tim >