RES: IPv6 tranisition issues

"Marcelo Barbosa Lima" <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 08:29:47 -0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.ngtrans
Message-ID	<D49EA2F934FFAD45B337C07A9753C00E017E9F9A@MAILSRV1.aquarius.cpqd.com.br>

 Hi Nick,

>
>
>Yes, in a typing fury I forgot/missed the IPv6 solution for mobility.
>IPv6 is streamlined and designed for mobility in mind. Again there are
>the patches in IPv4, although riddled with triangular routing issues.
>But then again is there anyone really into mobile IP? And I use NTT
>DoCoMo and likes in Japan as examples for this and not a 'hotspot' cafe
>answer on 802.11.
>

  In IPv4, attacks against ARP protocol (mobile IPv4 trusts in ARP protocol) are easy to implment. DHCP can also be bypassed easily. So, neighbour protocol with AH is more secure solution. Regards,

		Marcelo.