Re: [NNTP] New draft for LIST additions (-02)
Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:30:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nntp |
|---|---|
| Organization | TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/ |
| Message-ID | <FD52D45A12B64AC8BEADE030E1C6B968@Iulius> |
Hi all, > Text version: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elie-nntp-list-additions-0= 2.txt > > HTML version: > http://iulius.dinauz.org/draft-elie-nntp-list-additions-02.html We plan on releasing a new version of INN in March. Can we advertise the COUNTS, DISTRIBUTIONS, MODERATORS, MOTD and SUBSCRIP= TIONS variants of the LIST command? I believe the description of these command= s are stable and won't change from what is already specified in the above d= raft. Therefore, it should not hurt if we advertise them even though they are c= urrently described only in this Internet-Draft. Another question: can we implement the "Y" and "M" status fields? Do yo= u have any objection about them? It will allow to have all possible cases regarding how an article should be handled. The following table summarizes what usually happens to an article posted to only the newsgroup "foo.bar", depending on its status field on the news server: +--------------+-----------+------------+------------+--------------+ | Status field | Accepted | Accepted | Moderation | Destination | | of "foo.bar" | if local | from | needed? | if accepted? | | | posting? | peers? | | | +--------------+-----------+------------+------------+--------------+ | y | Yes | Yes | No | foo.bar | | n | No | Yes | No | foo.bar | | m | Yes | Yes | Yes | foo.bar | | Y | Yes | No | No | foo.bar | | M | Yes | No | Yes | foo.bar | | x | No | No | No | | | j | No | Yes | No | junk (if | | | | | | filed) | | =3Dother.group | No | Yes | No | other.group = | +--------------+-----------+------------+------------+--------------+ Last questions: are there any other remarks on this draft? and can I tr= y to submit it to the RFC Editor according to the independent submission st= ream process? --=20 Julien =C9LIE =AB Il n'y a pas moyen de contenter ceux qui veulent savoir le pourquoi des pourquoi. =BB (Leibniz)=20