[NNTP] Discrepancy in the definition of an extension
Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:05:44 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nntp |
|---|---|
| Organization | TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/ |
| Message-ID | <248B84F29291488DB4477F5E4098B857@Iulius> |
Hi,
Section 3.3.3 of RFC 3977 says that the definition of an extension
must include the following:
o Any new arguments the extension associates with any other
pre-existing NNTP commands.
However, RFC 4642, 4643 and 4644 say:
o This extension does not associate any new responses with pre-
existing NNTP commands.
There is a mismatch here.
What is the right wording? Isn't it "responses" instead of "arguments"
in RFC 3977?
Or maybe both responses and arguments?
--=20
Julien =C9LIE
=AB Love is when you look into someone's eyes, and see everything you nee=
d. =BB