[NNTP] Discrepancy in the definition of an extension

Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:05:44 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nntp
Organization TrigoFACILE -- http://www.trigofacile.com/
Message-ID <248B84F29291488DB4477F5E4098B857@Iulius>
Hi,

Section 3.3.3 of RFC 3977 says that the definition of an extension
must include the following:

   o  Any new arguments the extension associates with any other
      pre-existing NNTP commands.

However, RFC 4642, 4643 and 4644 say:

   o  This extension does not associate any new responses with pre-
      existing NNTP commands.


There is a mismatch here.

What is the right wording?  Isn't it "responses" instead of "arguments"
in RFC 3977?
Or maybe both responses and arguments?

--=20
Julien =C9LIE

=AB Love is when you look into someone's eyes, and see everything you nee=
d. =BB