Re: [NNTP] [Errata Rejected] RFC3977 (2004)

Barry,

The status has been changed as requested:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=2004

Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar

On May 14, 2012, at 7:26 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:

>>> I'd be happy, if Clive, Russ, and Julien all think it's the right
>>> approach, to change the erratum to "hold for document update".  Russ
>>> Allbery, do you have a comment on this?
>> 
>> Yes, please.  We would clearly want to fix this in any revision of RFC
>> 3977.  Personally, I would recommend that any implementor use 423 as
>> described in Julien's analysis despite the wording of RFC 3977.
> 
> OK, that works for me.
> 
> RFC Editor, will you please switch errata #2004 from "rejected" to
> "hold for document update"?  Thanks.
> 
> Barry
>