Re: [NNTP] [Errata Rejected] RFC3977 (2004)

Barry Leiba said:
> Well, the response in the rejection reason is taken directly from an
> exchange I had with Clive.  Now, he did also suggest that I might pass
> it by Russ Allbery, which I have not yet done.  Since he's copied on
> this exchange, he can comment.  Clive's point wasn't meant to say that
> your suggestion in the errata report wasn't good, but that it's not
> bringing up an *error* in the original spec.

To be honest, I'd forgotten that earlier discussion.

> I'd be happy, if Clive, Russ, and Julien all think it's the right
> approach, to change the erratum to "hold for document update".

I think we've all now agreed this is the right approach.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather          | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: [email protected]     | it will get its revenge.
Web: http://www.davros.org  |   - Henry Spencer
Mobile: +44 7973 377646