Re: GIST peering concern

Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I haven't seen any reply to this comment. Please do as I will not accept
outstanding issues when going forward with the doc.

Cheers

Magnus

Lauri J T Liuhto skrev:
> While implementing our own NSLPs and the API between GIST and NSLPs, we 
> came across something in the current NTLP i-d we think might be a 
> problem.
> 
> In section 4.3.2 "Local Processing and Validation" it is stated that: 
> "The first option (peering) MUST be chosen if the node is the final 
> destination of the Query message, or if the GIST hop count has reached 
> zero." We think this is problematic for at least two reasons.
> 
> 1) This removes flexibility from the NSLP application and forces certain 
>    behaviour. Thus it complicates NSLP application logic, since the NSLP 
>    must be aware of this exception to its peering "wishes".
> 
> 2) It could be possible to overload resources, such as memory and UDP 
>    send rate, of a GIST node. Sending Queries with an (intentionally)  
>    low GIST hop-count would lead to nodes being forced to peer, though 
>    it is stated in the same section (4.3.2), that a node can decline 
>    peering for "overload protection reasons".
> 
> We suggest that an error message be defined for the case when a flow 
> endpoint does not wish to peer, or that the definition of the "Endpoint 
> Found" message be extended to include this case. Currently section 4.3.4 
> seems to state, that "Endpoint Found" can only be sent when the NSLP is 
> not present on the GIST node.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Nuutti, Teemu and Lauri
> 


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM/M
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.