Re: Mobility Implementation Question

Max Laier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis
Organization Universität Karlsruhe (TH)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, I wrote:
> ...
>
> 2) Use a similar approach as the MRITS described in [1].  This would
> take place in the MN / CN respectively and translate the MRI according
> to the BindingCache (and/or the routing header).

Correction.  Obviously it won't use the routing header as the translation 
would ensure that the message is sent from/to the CoA and thus doesn't 
carry any routing headers.

-- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | [email protected]
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBHYDvjXyyEoT62BG0RAinCAJ4vrk/lVLuToGkSETpLvBOVpwysuQCfexcJ
rwroibkZSLQ96vMePz5XqfI=
=iJ/E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.