Re: (no subject)

ken carlberg <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> PS I don't think there's a connection between Y.1541 and
> the various ITU-T Admission Recs (Y.1571, now Y.2171).
> Y.1541 specifies categories of performance objectives (mostly), and
> it seems like a Scavenger service would have "Unspecified" objectives
> (same as the Y.1541 Best Effort). Scavenger is more about *when* it
> works than about how well, IMO.

again, my fault for twisting the references around.  I meant to refer  
to Y.1571

as for scavenger service, it uses resources not used by best effort or  
better than best effort flows.  so, if we assume a transit node only  
supports best effort, then during bursty spikes in load will allocate  
available resources to BE at the expense of scavenger service.  that  
may be a case of "when", but the result is a service below that of BE  
since you are not relying on random drop or drop from head schemas.

outside of scavenger service, I know of another on-going proprietary  
effort at lower than best effort service.

regards,

-ken
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.