Re: Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt
Francois Le Faucheur IMAP <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25 Feb 2008, at 21:27, ken carlberg wrote: > John, > >> I think wee need to be able to support a few different scenarios >> and usages for the admission priority. Is there a way that we >> could have a common structure to hold the values, and the ability >> to set the values accordingly? > > we have one way, as described by Francois. > > however, if there is a segment that is absolutely adamant in having > a field reflect the defined values of Y.1541 or Y.2171bis in the > QSPEC, then I think a new field should be defined in that document > to contain those values. The authors of the other documents can > decide if they too wish to add an ITU dependent field. > > the other option is to disregard any relation between the Admission > Priority field of the QSPEC and tsvwg-emergency-rsvp, which would > be a shame. Perhaps another option could be for the Qspec document to state that the Admission Priority values MAY be set according to Y.2171 (but not mandate those are the only valid assignment and not request creation of a Qspec-specific IANA registry for those)? Francois > > -ken > > > > _______________________________________________ nsis mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis