Re: Review of draft-ietf-nsis-applicability-mobility-signaling-09.txt

Dear Martin,

Thank you for your useful comments.
Please see my comments in line.

cheers,
Takako

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:57:47 +0100
"Martin Stiemerling" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Here is my review of draft-ietf-nsis-applicability-mobility-signaling-09.txt.
> 
> My comments:
> - Structure of the draft: 
>   - Section 3 reads "Problem Statement" but does cover problem statement
>     and NSIS solutions. I was confused as it mixes two different things.
> 	I would propose to either rename the chapter or to split problems
> 	and solutions. Or put solutions to section 4 only.

I see. 

>   - The focus of the document is set to QoS NSLP only. However, this is
>     not explicitly stated, nor can it be the sole intent of this document
> 	to focus to the QoS NSLP only. The NATFW NSLP folks also need to 
> 	deliver their input ;)

OK. we are loking forward to input from NATFW people ;-)

>   - It is probably good to split the solutions part in NTLP and NSLP
>     specific sections. This would answer a) what NTLP can do, b) 
> 	what each of the NSLPs can do.

Which section are you pointing out? Section4?

> - Section 5: interaction with MIPv4/MIPv6
>   - does this section consider all the other vanillas of mobile IP?
>   - does this section also consider other mobility schemes?

This section only covers MIPv4/v6 triangular route cases, especially
concentrates on tunneling operation. And this does not cover any other
MIP related operations discussed in other WGs such as MEXT, MIPSHOP,
MOBOPTS, NetLmm ...
As far as I remember, other MIP related operations than MIPv4/v6
tunneling was decided not to shown in detail, and only mentioned in
Further Study part.
Do you have any specific topics should be explained in main part (not in
Further Study)?

>   - Do we have any implementation (and/or deployment) experiences with 
>     NSIS and mobile IP?

I guess some universities have.

> - Section 6: Why is there a section about futher studies? I do know why,
>   but the text is not very clear about this.

Can you point out which section (part) text is not clear?

> Speaking as NATFW NSLP guy: I would like to have a discussion at the IETF
> meeting to discuss the impact of mobility to the NATFW NSLP. We can do
> this in one of the breaks or in the evening.

Can you suggest possible time slots? ;-)

> 
>   Martin
>   
> [email protected]   <== NEW ADDRESS
> 
> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
> NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis

-- 
Takako Sanda <[email protected]>