Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-05

Hi, Magnus:

There is an important typo in reference to NSIS-QSPEC priority. NSIS-QSPEC is version 19 and resource-priority is in Section 5.2.9 (not Section 6.2.9).

More importantly, this draft needs to reference ONLY to this of part of the resource-priority that is successfully resolved by the NSIS WG in relation to the consensus of the QSPEC draft (e.g. not to specifically mention Y.xxxx resource-priority ONLY, etc. because it will create confusions and distractions about the main technical aspects).

Ken and other members need to look into this as they have taken the lead in resolving the issues related to the QSSPEC draft.

Otherwise, the draft seems to be well-written, and I also agree with Janet other than the above.

Sorry that I missed the last Friday's deadline.

Best regards,
Radhika

PS: For SIP and SIPPING WG members:

RFC 3312 and RFCs related to SIP call flows need to use the latest RFCs of NSIS and TSVWG for taking care of QOS.


----- Original Message -----
From: Janet P Gunn 
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2008 21:09
Subject: Re: [NSIS] WG last call on draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-05
To: Magnus Westerlund 
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], NSIS , tsvwg 

> Just saying that, from my perspective, "it is ready to be 
> published". And, 
> yes I have read it and followed the discussions on the related 
> DIME and 
> NSIS documents.
> 
> Janet Gunn
> 
> Computer Sciences Corporation 
> Registered Office: 2100 East Grand Avenue, El Segundo California 
> 90245, 
> USA
> Registered in USA No: C-489-59
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> please 
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the 
> mistake in 
> delivery. 
> NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 
> CSC to 
> any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written 
> agreement 
> or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail 
> for such 
> purpose.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> 
> 
> [email protected] wrote on 03/26/2008 12:32:06 PM:
> 
> > Magnus Westerlund skrev:
> > > This announces the second WG last call on "Resource 
> ReSerVation 
> Protovol 
> > > (RSVP) Extensions for Emergency Services" with the intended 
> status of 
> > > proposed standard:
> > > 
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-05.txt
> > > 
> > > This is the second one due to changes and the interaction with 
> documents 
> > > in the NSIS and DIME WG. Please provide any comments on the 
> TSVWG 
> > > mailing list no later than 28th of March. (Yes, it is long but 
> that is 
> 
> > > due to the meeting and that we have several other WG last 
> calls 
> ongoing).
> > > 
> > 
> > This is a reminder about the WG last call. Without some comments 
> we 
> > can't judge consensus on publishing this document. So please 
> provide any 
> 
> > comments, even if just to say that it is ready to be published.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > Magnus Westerlund
> > 
> > IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287
> > Torshamsgatan 23 | Fax +46 8 7575550
> > S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email protected]
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > nsis mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>