Re: [tsv-area] FSA signalling issues

Roland,
 
Thanks. 
 
Please keep in touch. I will take a look at NSIS.
 
John




----- Original Message ----
From: Roland Bless <[email protected]>
To: JOHN ADAMS <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, 27 August, 2008 8:17:51 AM
Subject: Re: [tsv-area] FSA signalling issues

Hi John,

JOHN ADAMS wrote:
> I gave a talk at Dublin in the Transport Area Open meeting. The subject
> was developments
> at the ITU-T on Flow State Aware (FSA) standardisation.
>  
> A question raised at the IETF was (roughly) "why isn't a new extension
> of RSVP being proposed
> to accommodate the requirements of FSA signalling?"
>  
> I attach an intial response to that question in the form of an issues
> list that will also be proposed as
> a new Appendix of the draft ITU Recommendation Q.flowstatesig. The
> conclusions of this first
> analysis are that:
> - it is an aim that we try our hardest to fit within the preferred
> architectural framework of RSVP
> - however there are a number of challenging issues and, since that is
> the case, the preferred approach
>    is to keep other options open.
>  
> Please get back to me with issues that will help the continued progress
> of FSA at the next IETF

It seems that the work in the NSIS WG would be a much better fit
to FSA than RSVP. Furthermore, since it is easier to extend NSIS
than RSVP, you should definitely have a look at the work there.

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nsis/

However, I have to look at the FSA in order to better understand
your objectives and to find a good match...

Regards,
Roland

_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis