Re: GIST Q/D-mode issue

Hi Lauri and all,

Roland Bless wrote:
> I'd like to propose a different option 3): why not use a new message
> type for stateless DATA messages? From the internal protocol logic
> this would also be easy to implement as a Q-flag, since this type
> of DATA message needs a special handling, but it avoids
> wasting the flag bit.

Max Laier proposed option 4):
use a different magic number for Q-Mode and D-Mode messages.
Any opinions?

Regards,
 Roland