Re: I-D ACTION:draft-rahman-rtg-router-alert-dangerous-00.txt

"McDonald, Andrew" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis,gmane.ietf.tsvwg
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
David Ward wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2008, at 4:52 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>> And if the document is going to say that no future protocol is going to
>> use RAO, then please provide a viable alternative that will work better.
> 
> DW: Use IPv6 RA :-)

Are you saying that you regard IPv6 RAO as OK, but IPv4 RAO is bad? The 
current draft seems to lump IPv4 (RFC2113) and IPv6 (RFC2711) router 
alert together.

Andrew
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.