Re: Working Group Last Call: Y.1541 QOSM

Jukka Manner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear all,

After considerable extra time, we can conclude the WGLC on the Y.1541. 
There were no objections, only supporting comments.

Authors, please update the draft and take into account the following 
items I found in my own chair's review:

- Some of the references hyperlinks do not work in the html version

- The text looks a bit weird since you have typically twice the 
reference, e.g., "As stated above, [Y.1541] [Y.1541] is ..."

- Is parameter M measured in octets? Please specify explicitly. Same for 
Bp, actually.

- Restoration priority: you describe some candidate time values that are 
based on current technology. Wouldn't it be good to add this 
time-to-restore as an optional value in the object, say, instead of 
having 42 bits unused, this field could indicate in milliseconds how 
fast the restoration SHOULD be. The network can of course decide 
otherwise. A value of all 0's would mean "Unspecified". This would allow 
the spec to be future proof. The values you give in the spec could be 
default values to be used.

Regards,
Jukka
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.