Re: Working Group Last Call: Y.1541 QOSM
Jukka Manner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear all, After considerable extra time, we can conclude the WGLC on the Y.1541. There were no objections, only supporting comments. Authors, please update the draft and take into account the following items I found in my own chair's review: - Some of the references hyperlinks do not work in the html version - The text looks a bit weird since you have typically twice the reference, e.g., "As stated above, [Y.1541] [Y.1541] is ..." - Is parameter M measured in octets? Please specify explicitly. Same for Bp, actually. - Restoration priority: you describe some candidate time values that are based on current technology. Wouldn't it be good to add this time-to-restore as an optional value in the object, say, instead of having 42 bits unused, this field could indicate in milliseconds how fast the restoration SHOULD be. The network can of course decide otherwise. A value of all 0's would mean "Unspecified". This would allow the spec to be future proof. The values you give in the spec could be default values to be used. Regards, Jukka