Re: QSPEC Questions

Elwyn Davies <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Based on Dan's AD review comments for draft-ietf-dime-qos-parameters-06 I
> need to ask a few questions regarding the QSPEC draft:
>
> * There is no description of the differences between TMOD-1 and TMOD-2.
> Useful to say something about the difference?  
>
> * Where does the description for <Path Jitter>, <Path PLR> and <Path PER>
> come from? There is no reference to another RFC given in these sections.
>   
Y.1541... 
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-ietf-nsis-y1541-qosm-06.txt
> * Why is Path Jitter STAT4(Reserved) included in the <Path Jitter>
> parameter? 
>   
Repeat of something in Y.1541 QOSM
Don't have a copy of Y.1541 itself and there is no justification in the 
draft.

/E
> * The encoding of the  <RPH Priority> Parameter is not inline with
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-09.txt. The ALRP
> Priority and the Reserved octets 
> positions are inversed. 
>
> * <DSTE Class Type> Parameter
>
> The QSPEC draft says:
> "
>  DSTE Class Type: Indicates the DSTE class type.  Values currently
>    allowed are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
> "
>
> RFC 4124 does not define a value of 0. Where does 0 come from? 
> In RFC 4124 the field is only 3 bits long. Why is it 8 bytes long in the
> QSPEC document? 
>
> Your feedback is appreciated!
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.