Re: QSPEC Questions
Al Morton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 03:14 PM 11/6/2008, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >Al, > >shouldn't we provide that type of context in the document as well? I agree, perhaps that's why I dug-up the details and shared them on the list. These are non-trivial calculations in some cases, but procedures exist. Al >They document does not appear self contained enough so that a regular reader >can understand it easily. > >Ciao >Hannes > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Al Morton [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: 06 November, 2008 19:44 > >To: Xiaoming Fu; Hannes Tschofenig > >Cc: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [NSIS] QSPEC Questions > > > >At 09:24 PM 11/1/2008, Xiaoming Fu wrote: > >>Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > >>... > >>>* Where does the description for <Path Jitter>, <Path PLR> and <Path > >>>PER> come from? There is no reference to another RFC given > >in these sections. > >> > >>QSPEC ID suggested packet jitter is based on [rfc3393], but I am not > >>sure whether (nominal) jitter values are directly addable > >across multiple hops. > > > >It's possible to accumulate Jitter values, if they're measured > >and specified in the appropriate form. > >The more detailed references include Rec Y.1541, > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-spatial-composition-07 > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-delay-var-as-01 > >>Also, is PLR or PER directly addable (or just a multiplication)? > > > >see the first two refs above. > >Al > >