QoS NSLP flags
Roland Bless <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Organization | Institute of Telematics, University of Karlsruhe |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I've got two questions: 1) would it be good to let any unknown flags intact instead of resetting them? Current text says: "The set of appropriate flags depends on the particular message being processed. Any bit not defined as a flag for a particular message MUST be set to zero on sending and MUST be ignored on receiving." If I understand the text correctly, an additional flag cannot pass a QNE, or does "set to zero" apply only to the QNI? 2) We suggest that the QUERY gets an additional bit in the message flags. Sometimes it might be useful to elicit a RESERVE with the R=1 bit set (in the RESERVE, i.e., a REPLACE bit) and sometimes not. So it would be good to have a bit in a QUERY that provides information at the far end on how to the the REPLACE bit in the corresponding RESERVE. Does this make sense? Regards, -- Roland Bless -- WWW: http://www.tm.uka.de/~bless Institute of Telematics, University of Karlsruhe, Germany