Re: Reply to the IETF liaison on Flow State Aware/ Q.Flowstatesig
Magnus Westerlund <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi John, I also include IESG in this reply as the liaison statement was sent by the IESG and not the NSIS WG. One important comment about how to go forward. JOHN ADAMS skrev: > I will be bringing a longer version of this note as an IETF draft at the > next meeting. I am looking for guidance on what, in the short-term, > would be the best way of proceeding in the IETF (short-term being > between now and the end of 2009 and with a focus on the work already > completed at the ITU) and what would be better in the longer-term to > involve everyone more in what seems to be an exciting new technology. John, Internet drafts are not submitted to a meeting. There are no need for a meeting for us to discuss the draft on the mailing list and make decisions. So please submit the draft as soon as possible. The sooner you submit it the sooner we can discuss the content. Best Regards Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ nsis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis