Re: AD review comments of draft-ietf-nsis-qos-nslp-16

Hi Roland, thanks for the note, we'll fix this one, too.

Jukka

Roland Bless wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> 
>> G. Section 5.1.2.2:
>> "A QUERY message
>>    MAY contain a second QSPEC object."
>>      QUERY = COMMON_HEADER
>>               [ RII ][ *BOUND_SESSION_ID ]
>>               [ PACKET_CLASSIFIER ] [ INFO_SPEC ] QSPEC
>>
>> The BNF seem to not allow for a second QSPEC object.
> 
> Good catch. I guess that this is a remnant from an earlier
> approach.
> 
> Our student Matthias Dettling actually found further inconsistencies
> related to QSPEC presence in QUERYs.
> 
> Section 5.1.2.2 states:
>  QUERY messages MUST always include a QSPEC.
> 
> Section 4.3 states:
>    To make a receiver-initiated reservation, the QNR constructs a QUERY
>    message, which may contain a QSPEC object from its chosen QoS model
>    (see Figure 8).
> 
> So _may_ is not appropriate here since it MUST contain a QSPEC.
> 
> Furthermore in section 5.4.2 is written:
>    If the QUERY
>    contained a QSPEC, it MUST be passed to the RMF where it may be
>    modified by the QoS Model specific QUERY processing.
> 
> The "if" is clearly wrong since a QSPEC MUST be included and
> I guess that the sentence is a duplicate of the earlier statement in the
> third paragraph of this section:
>   When a QNE receives a QUERY message the QSPEC is passed to the RMF
>   for processing.
> 
> Regards,
>  Roland
> 

-- 
Jukka MJ Manner, Professor, PhD.  Phone:  +358+(0)9+451 2481
Helsinki University of Technology Mobile: +358+(0)50+5112973
Department of Communications      Fax:    +358+(0)9+451 2474
and Networking (Comnet)           Office: G320 (Otakaari 5A)
P.O. Box 3000, FIN-02015 TKK      E-mail: [email protected]
Finland                           WWW:    www.comnet.tkk.fi