Re: GIST: Change of IANA Considerations: Action Type for code point allocation

Hi Magnus, Hi all


I think "IETF Review" is more appropriate!

Does this comment on the IANA actions also apply to the 
IANA actions for the QoS-NSLP draft?

Best regards,
Georgios




 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund
> Sent: maandag 25 januari 2010 14:52
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NSIS] GIST: Change of IANA Considerations: 
> Action Type for code point allocation
> 
> Martin Stiemerling skrev 2010-01-25 10:53:
> 
> > **Call for WG consensus**:
> > Is anybody objecting that the IANA actions in 
> draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-20 currently requiring "Standards 
> Action" are changed to "Expert Review"?
> > 
> > Let the WG and me know your objections or agreement to this 
> by January 29th 5pm CET.
> > 
> 
> Actually I would suggest IETF Review, meaning that any 
> extension must pass IETF last call before being published to 
> get a codepoint.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> 
> IETF Transport Area Director
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [email protected]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>