Re: WGLC: GIST over SCTP and DTLS

Hi Jukka,

For the convenience of the WG to have a quick overview of the previous 
WGLC, below I list the received WGLC comments and updates to address 
those comments during last WGLC:

WGLC issued on Jan 26, 2009:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis/current/msg08471.html

Comments from Andrew McDonald:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis/current/msg08483.html
Feedbacks:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis/current/msg08493.html

Comments from Lauri J T Liuhto:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis/current/msg08484.html
Feedbacks:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis/current/msg08494.html

Comments from Roland Bless:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis/current/msg08497.html
Feedbacks and summary:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis/current/msg08514.html

(Other emails: supported the publication of the ID; skipped here)

Diffs (the diff between v7-v8 was minor):
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-sctp-05.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-sctp-08.txt

@WG members: We would greatly appreciate if you could provide their 
opinions, feedback and any additional comments you might have.

Thanks,
Xiaoming

Jukka Manner wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> This starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on
> 
> General Internet Signaling Transport (GIST) over SCTP and Datagram TLS
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-sctp-08
> 
> Please review the document thoroughly and provide feedback on whether 
> and why it is worth pushing the work through. There ought to be clear 
> support and reasons why the work should be finished and not dropped.
> 
> Submit your feedback by Monday February 8th.
> 
> regards,
> Jukka (with WG chair hat on)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis