Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
Thomas Narten <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:58:10 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis,gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I agree, but in this case the issue is even more fundamental than the > document structure. If FOO is experimental technology, does it make > sense to require that extensions of FOO are standards? Ah, I see now. And I agree with you -- it doesn't seem to make sense! Thomas