Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section

Thomas Narten <[email protected]> Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:58:10 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis,gmane.ietf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I agree, but in this case the issue is even more fundamental than the 
> document structure. If FOO is experimental technology, does it make 
> sense to require that extensions of FOO are standards?

Ah, I see now. And I agree with you -- it doesn't seem to make sense!

Thomas