Re: Poll: Indicating tunnel capability

I will do.

Thanks!

Charles




On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Jukka Manner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It seems the WG wants to see this simpler way to indicate the tunnel
> capability.
>
> Charles, please update the draft, fix any last comments, and we will ask for
> publication.
>
> Regards,
> Jukka
>
>
>>> 2. The other option is to define a 0-length, no flags, object entitled
>>> NODE_CAPABILITY_TUNNEL. The presence of this object implies support for
>>> tunnels (no T-bit is needed, the whole 32-bit field is reserved).
>