Re: IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

At 04:11 PM 12/7/2010, James M. Polk wrote:
>...It's hard for me - with a straight face - to go with option (a) 
>because of the time involved prior to the IPR disclosure since -00 
>(June 2006), especially the time past WGLC (11 months).

I suspected that the terms might have something to do
with the tragically late disclosure when voting for a),
but I'd *still* like to hear a word or two from the authors
on all of this.  Then there will be less need to speculate.

Al