Re: IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

Roland Bless <[email protected]> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:20:52 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.nsis
Organization	Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi,

On 08.12.2010 08:55, Fu, Xiaoming wrote:
> I would vote for c).

It's not clear to me
> a) Do members of the WG accept those terms,
> b) Do you want to redesign the protocol to work around the IPR,
> c) Do you want to ask Columbia to modify the terms, or
> d) Do we drop the document from the WG (authors can still pursue publications through the independent track)?

Jukka said: