Re: IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

"Calvin Chu" <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:17:31 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.nsis
Message-ID <FBC92463F12E5849A42E8995D9D79D5F76E3EE@CUIT-EXCHANGE2.ais.columbia.edu>
All,

I've just subscribed to the list so I'm trying to catch up to the
current conversation.

I'm open to modifying the terms, please send me suggestions.  As to
whether Columbia would just modify the terms arbitrarily later, I could
get it into writing if that helps.  

I've been informed there are some questions regarding the specific FRAND
terms in non-open source commercial situations. My thoughts were to set
a simple flat fee for that sole situation.   If this is reasonable, I
can defer to members of this list to suggest what may be fair.  If this
does not sound reasonable, I'll do my best to make things right by this
list members, after all, Columbia neglected to declare on time.  

Best regards,

Calvin Chu
Senior Licensing Officer
Columbia Technology Ventures
http://techventures.columbia.edu
Tel: (212) 851-4140
Twitter: cchu


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Roland Bless
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:24 AM
To: Fu, Xiaoming
Cc: Jukka Manner; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NSIS] IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University
in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to
draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

Hi,

[sorry, previous message was cut, I accidentally hit the send button
instead of the edit menu :-)]

On 08.12.2010 08:55, Fu, Xiaoming wrote:
> I would vote for c).

It's not clear to me what prevents the Columbia University
from changing terms back later if they are changing the terms
now on our request?

> a) Do members of the WG accept those terms,
> b) Do you want to redesign the protocol to work around the IPR,
> c) Do you want to ask Columbia to modify the terms, or
> d) Do we drop the document from the WG (authors can still pursue
publications through the independent track)?

Jukka said:
> Please indicate your preference within two weeks, by Friday 17th at:
> 
> http://www.doodle.com/mb2gvfit64bnya99 

Regards,
 Roland
_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis