Errata 977 for RFC 4230
Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Feb 2011 09:41:46 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.nsis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The errata 977 for RFC 4230 (http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=977) seems to be correct, in the sense that the figure 1 is not explicitly saying RSVP INTEGRITY object.
However, this can be fixed in a possible revision of RFC 4230, meaning that the proposed action for this errata is "Hold for Document Update". The proposed fixed would be to replace the standalone "object" in figure 1 with " RSVP INTEGRITY object".
Please send any comment to the nsis list until Feb 23 COB PT.
The text from the errata 977:
Section 3.4 says:
[...]. The RSVP INTEGRITY object (outer object) covers the
entire RSVP message, whereas the POLICY_DATA INTEGRITY object only
covers objects within the POLICY_DATA element.
It should say:
[not submitted]
Notes:
The subsequent Figure 1 (on top of page 10)
does *not* depict this security relevant object at all.
Has there something been fost from Figure 1 ?
from pending
[email protected]
NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014