[openpgp] Re: Primary Key Binding sigs on authentication sub keys
Justus Winter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Daniel Huigens <[email protected]> writes: > So, unless folks think it's worth changing that, we could also consider > deprecating authentication subkeys entirely, and say that an application > that (for some reason) wants to do authentication using OpenPGP, should > use a dedicated key/certificate, and just use a normal signing (sub)key? Wait, what? Counting individual uses, I think authentication as in creating signatures using my authentication-capable subkey is my primary use case for OpenPGP. FWIW, Sequoia requires primary key binding signatures on signatures binding authentication-capable subkeys. Best, Justus _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 584 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsC7BAEBCgBvBYJnkSHaCRCI3H4zOF95HUcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9u cy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmeJMswNXjoLR0R14nfbjYXVnmVsEj6IcOAZKXTedBA5 ShYhBCVqTlXkpy2XrSRo54jcfjM4X3kdAAAnlAf/b94dtpp8rNvpm8eKRbdmSlGS UHXArL5ZlSaVWlpEcPIJXIfz1ocMVhFBgWQX2DE8GlUL33lLEmXWxQhnDEZZJyiZ BPckzknTkvYsRGNcfnBbk72b7bVPZTE9tmlB7U2By3aiIPzlLtYbWSce6HbjcRmN hOCWHuWF+Iw9J/1g8zyFjgpiNDyLUZ4k2w9Zt5l7m7PbU/jrIrziDaGntTTw4g0n gNr6kIZXdG0ZJgmShSW6AuIY1+wrh7AigZlTGYntPltspSIpfOIwDCHy3GI8oGkL 9ocRSRKJUrq8/X/v+TQUe6tVqql2r11vlnuTM3izOnDdkX1WPxMHZnacWl0Y3w== =vsfk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----