[openpgp] Re: Primary Key Binding sigs on authentication sub keys

Daniel Huigens <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <tIhav3cCbJLSw89FGpA2p8xRlysJCk5P41NESZjBVdJL9tnrCiM-Oezdq7lMk1SjdurUxGLBUU4yePr4TgYSZdNPglCiZXs7WaNbt-0I6EQ=@protonmail.com>
Hi Stephan,

I am not proposing to change the specification in this thread.

In the PR that Andrew linked, I proposed to align our implementation
with text in the specification that predates my involvement and is
present in RFC4880, Section 11.1:

   For subkeys that can issue signatures, the subkey binding signature
   MUST contain an Embedded Signature subpacket with a primary key
   binding signature (0x19) issued by the subkey on the top-level key.

Similarly, the idea of authenticating using OpenPGP signatures was not
raised by me but by RFC4880, Section 2.2:

2.2.  Authentication via Digital Signature

   The digital signature uses a hash code or message digest algorithm,
   and a public-key signature algorithm.  The sequence is as follows:
   (...)

If you or anyone else is of the opinion that this text is wrong,
please propose to change it, but surely you'd agree that it's a
good thing for the specification and its implementations to match.


Finally, I'll note that the changes in RFC9580 were not solely
proposed by me but by a group of people, all of whom (in my view)
had the best interest of OpenPGP in mind, and not only for email.
It's a shame that not all implementations were on board and that
things turned out the way they did, but I won't rehash that further
here.

Best,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.