[openpgp] Re: Size of ML-DSA Secret key in draft-ietf-openpg p-pqc and other considerations

Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 11 Feb 2025, at 08:52, Daniel Huigens <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I would even say something like; we SHOULD use SHA3 to match
> the security of the signing algorithm, but MAY use SHA2 if needed
> for CNSA compliance.

Won’t CNSA also require sha2 for the signing algorithm? In which case just saying that the algorithms SHOULD match might be sufficient?

A
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.