[openpgp] Re: I-D list for Open Specification for Pretty Goo d Privacy notification: Changes to draft-gallagher-openpgp-code -point-exhaustion
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 19 Mar 2025, at 10:20, Justus Winter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your proposal breaks computing the fingerprint of secret key packets > again unless the implementation understands your multi-byte encoding. > I consider that a regression. > > I'm going to strongly push back on anything that makes parsing OpenPGP > artifacts impossible unless you know some as of yet unknown algorithm or > encoding scheme. That is a nightmare for forward-compatibility. Absolutely, being unable to parse unknown packet versions/types causes problems. I’m just trying to get ahead of the issue by publishing this idea decades in advance of it ever becoming necessary, so that if and when it does, we will have had plenty of time to prepare. A _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmfaohQACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZinniBAAkQCXBX5fW2VgFYRhX0snft5ZD3rsWB7oL31tmLG3qxgSUBtSR2ICKsSc F+BoqIw+3k16v1MzM0WW38S57IPu4zjXGk2PcxSeGnVfY7bbO6MQyJzVh3tILAhr dMyhHyoqlrf5l6Re1nfrRf+/gi/wRs2grpxv/OquwmViXA3CNDN9Hp7hlvWlKCt/ yTXPqQeFCiFZFm6yQXN6dFvChY+kytZ2OxNGGfjcX+Xf4ippwquBwH7w7sVH3Iup J72/3DFFUcElrm/evF6XLKqlS7A9+psY/cFIy7GRmmUPhQZHT3niP/RCDtq/mwQ0 bCzaeIC4zgHGoKoI4/CBC8jbPhjr3nX+I2XNJRFg/QD+UX1Mm1O23Op6WA6Wyg7g Yfa2M+ptzOmV1sqHvCgM71yD26w8Wn9EOY8MI88dWjjKBUAufrq1VEtVe36pf4/j cYFQ/93uPzf9KqPT46TRkGs6/I0rWS6Wa4zqhkWIOTe9337PVXqsHmAYhn3D9FKy LOSNPUsL+lYodvsNt3cVOH+pgHjSg6B0LtMfAToTgRMeOud9jjXb8JdpIzCubMfX NzjLE5KPps0wtDTwXIQWo0bsbHGcGCAVGqn8nurZoMCHQmmkNIO05fM4qDblmfcG hmWBKlWEXZUeWbzvtPi28/dc5h+aZIXGHDjS8iRSK19IdR14iX0= =ayZL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----