[openpgp] Re: Outstanding questions re Key Replacement draft

Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On 15 Mar 2025, at 05:43, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I also prefer option 0.

As I mentioned just now in the IETF122 meeting, given that there are multiple explicitly reasoned preferences in favour of option 0, and only one for option 1, I am leaning towards option 0 (no further change) at this time.

If anyone has any further objections to the current state of fallback, please speak up in the next two weeks. If not, I will release a (final???) draft and recommend adding it to the queue for WGLC (after PQC).

Thanks, everyone.
A

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmfb9qQACgkQXB7EBNWQ
Zik+GA//TEJHQ+JPvMGrWza/7/JTOHQmCRgfmBFR07brRVrdUjSkngWjIBSQy5dq
SbYb64sAkbXwPfi5ysoq/p/nP5O5+nq1BaBTXm0iUiBi6pjXlWJ2BcYSggk4DkiV
x9IHXsYNQSmfS954dAVxeUzIWrYMmMqYOImibXBe5iejwGq3EGV3bk73FUy8j6tm
9PltL3rh4n6hz2ZvF8AgXa4nBIM/uyJBWXr6lTN0Enpq3SArWLYTvFwkcnHImM1u
wvR1yPOXTwbUywzOSw8GRH0564XPlWtPjUdlpgAhUzVHIxqDNc+1Ewe924kdNDnK
jjKOsok5LRNpzsFDySK11skk+oe9kjbfDSlgXo9j9RfqaKK8Cv8aH5qR66ocb3ha
ApcmbqJqV8iWsf88dFqhksgIqbyZE3/w3jvfzYPGHuQ8T+EWGj2QYBx+cKBWXe9C
igrh7VUrklU63jINVxYraIJVPAdYy+4NpEFyqI5AyqNcfvXSS3pv2Kp0EzOZ1UHB
66dAf9EZmT6E9y7gtn+izIemqF22igVWv76oFB4nNGCynZ5CmSgsgI66xh01abjL
fW+DypRmsGprULGp57d7UaBJqjd7/fnelozfGNBJMf9iA6Q/OzoJ8Lk6YfbTdjhA
aYvjJ3sqXWseEnzoH38i7KT1FaCDnH6zHCfKzzZXT4BGQF5PCk0=
=uK6w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.