[openpgp] Re: adding validate-userid to the sopv subset
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu 2025-05-01 10:52:05 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm looking at adding sop's "validate-userid" subcommand (which does > > simple one-hop User ID validation from a set of fully trusted > > authorities) to the next revision of the sopv verification-only subset. > > So the answers the question: can I (given my current "trust anchors", > e.g. "trust ultimate") validate userid XYZ? yep, that's right. > > My reasoning for this is that the functionality from an OpenPGP > > perspective is very similar -- it's just a different type of OpenPGP > > signature being checked. And, it would make it possible to use a sopv > > implementation to implement identity-checked signature verification. > > Yes, it sounds reasonable, but it does stray into keyring management. > I agree that it fits into stateless, no secret key, etc. though. To be clear: The Stateless OpenPGP command line interface itself ("sop") already has a "validate-userid" subcommand, which does what is described above. My question here is whether it makes sense to add it to "sopv" (the verification-only subset of sop) > Who/when would use it? > Would it be used in, for instance, SBOM verification? I could imagine it being used, for example, in validating signatures in a e-mail. For example, consider an automated system that accepts some control messages over e-mail; it only accepts them from specific senders and only when they're cryptographically signed. The incoming e-mail has a "From" address, and the system has a set of trust anchors, and it knows which OpenPGP certificate has correctly signed the e-mail… what is it missing? Assuming we're working within the model that cryptographic certificates are bound to e-mail addresses, the thing missing is the connection between the "From" address and the certificate that signed the message. sopv validate-userid --addr-spec-only "$from_address" anchors.cert < signing.cert ought to be able to make that work. If folks have other scenarios, i'd certainly be interested -- not entirely sure how it would work out for SBOM verification. > > There is also a separate request to make "validate-userid" fancier than > > a simple one-hop validator (See > > https://gitlab.com/dkg/openpgp-stateless-cli/-/issues/121) but for sopv > > 1.2 i'm inclined to just keep it at a one-hop mechanism for the moment. > > In the olden days, I would use one of the find a path from A->B web sites to > do that... then discover which people I needed to bug to sign some key so > that we'd have a trusted path. Right, this kind of pathbuilding is a more complex process than what i'm asking about for sopv right now. It's also substantially more dubious. Just because i'm convinced that certificate A belongs to Alice doesn't mean that i should be willing to rely on Alice's assertion that certificate B belongs to Bob. So the "trusted path" idea is actually a pretty strange one, and even if we're talking about "trust signatures" (certifications with OpenPGP "trust subpackets"), that approach has a lot of surprising twists to it (e.g. see the recent discussion on https://dev.gnupg.org/T7611 ) So for the moment, sop (and sopv) is sticking with a one-hop model, but i'd encourage anyone interested in the pathfinding approaches to weigh in on #121, and maybe offer an MR that addresses the raised issues. --dkg _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 227 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRjrBGOWy5dZsiKhad4C4VO2cK0lgUCaBPyygAKCRB4C4VO2cK0 lnlzAQDKRZ3iLS3QqjURP00TwhNy7OvUapJZO2P4POGLoKuhRQD/etihRRYPa2B0 mr8+3XtQwthlFztn/ROGV5kD5aS0aQs= =YDpN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----