[openpgp] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc

Simo Sorce <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Organization Red Hat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Some counter-comment inline.

Also adding that while I do not really like exactly every single choice
in these documents I think they are a good WG compromise and should be
moved forward w/o delay.

On Tue, 2025-05-13 at 23:11 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> - I think (but am not 100% sure) we want it to be true that
>    no implementation makes unexpected multiple uses of any
> secret or private value at any time. For example, KEM
> private values when sending a mail to multiple recipients
> or signature private keys when signing twice with algs
> 32/33. Is that the case?  If so, should we say it (more)
> explicitly? We almost do say this in a few places, some of
> which RECOMMEND not re-using, others of which call for
> "independent" generation. Is this something we could
> tighten up on without breaking any use-cases? If we do have
> some real use-case that needs to re-use a secret or private
> value, (basically other than multiple alg-specific signing
> private key use), can we describe that as the
> counter-example to just saying RECOMMENDED rather than MUST
> NOT?

When using HW tokens with small storage it may be required to be able
to use the same private key for multiple signature schemes, I think
RECOMMENDs is strong enough and MUST NOT would be excessive (also
difficult to enforce, so kinda toothless).

> - 2.1: Five is IMO too many signature options. Can we not
>    reduce that number?  If not (as I suspect, I always lose
> this argument;-) then it'll help with later document
> processing if we can document why we need five in e.g. an
> email, in case someone asks, which they probably will.  (I
> forget if we covered this specifically in earlier debates
> sorry, if a reference provides a good answer, that's just
> fine.)

We ultimately want more than five, because the hybrids explode the
matrix, so I think this is something you just will have to make peace
with :-D

-- 
Simo Sorce
Distinguished Engineer
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat, Inc

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.