[openpgp] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc
Simo Sorce <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Some counter-comment inline. Also adding that while I do not really like exactly every single choice in these documents I think they are a good WG compromise and should be moved forward w/o delay. On Tue, 2025-05-13 at 23:11 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > - I think (but am not 100% sure) we want it to be true that > no implementation makes unexpected multiple uses of any > secret or private value at any time. For example, KEM > private values when sending a mail to multiple recipients > or signature private keys when signing twice with algs > 32/33. Is that the case? If so, should we say it (more) > explicitly? We almost do say this in a few places, some of > which RECOMMEND not re-using, others of which call for > "independent" generation. Is this something we could > tighten up on without breaking any use-cases? If we do have > some real use-case that needs to re-use a secret or private > value, (basically other than multiple alg-specific signing > private key use), can we describe that as the > counter-example to just saying RECOMMENDED rather than MUST > NOT? When using HW tokens with small storage it may be required to be able to use the same private key for multiple signature schemes, I think RECOMMENDs is strong enough and MUST NOT would be excessive (also difficult to enforce, so kinda toothless). > - 2.1: Five is IMO too many signature options. Can we not > reduce that number? If not (as I suspect, I always lose > this argument;-) then it'll help with later document > processing if we can document why we need five in e.g. an > email, in case someone asks, which they probably will. (I > forget if we covered this specifically in earlier debates > sorry, if a reference provides a good answer, that's just > fine.) We ultimately want more than five, because the hybrids explode the matrix, so I think this is something you just will have to make peace with :-D -- Simo Sorce Distinguished Engineer RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]