[openpgp] Re: PQC: Proposed Standard or Informational?

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed 2025-06-18 07:24:52 +0200, Falko Strenzke wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion, I overlooked that Aron already went forward ;-)

Thanks, Aron for going forward with the revised version. If we get
substantial pushback on Proposed Standard here on list, or as part of
IETF last call, we can always change the document back to Informational
status.  It seems like there is an plausible initial consensus that
Proposed Standard is the way to go.

Regards,

         --dkg

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.