[openpgp] Re: Analysis document
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10 Jul 2025, at 18:00, Daniel Huigens <[email protected]> wrote: > > But also, forbidding signing over non-UTF-8 data doesn't automatically require failing to verify in that case, instead the verifier could just assume that the data that was signed over is UTF-8, and I think that'd probably be simplest & safest as well. Ah yes, that’s a reasonable interpretation. I’ve updated the editor’s copy now. A _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmhwxrcACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZilBcg//ZF7LfhE/xzq2Z3P4YyvTmY8TUlKP3tPeboCze/IEhKLMek+N2mLHucEW aKVtlW0smerY82UxGA5Wkpgqb5nWmPohDT7YWrLpsDJ0w5EIRsGhF3XXUOZMR5mt 5VQciYi35oTHD3bZZ2RNxQl2sK6ec6ZEK4sYmXqrRkxfPbbJIJWE2zYw8DHQ/KJS 15w7aDQPcTrng784/lMtnZTUNSDntK1emseogqq5wA8aSsqWEjmuRVOXMDjZX2r1 EaS4fXG7vAx1U9ERTLLiKuoJSR0l0G0ymVgwlbotYEd0YB9RDW0R7R10B6yhekkX CwJBhgEeOvJjCWEJpABqjFZFPo4NaJ2isgP4+eaaGcUhdjXygfSXl4Cw0q4hSj3u ozh/DnJgSn29Vp7JxEispy44ue1PkLw7m8OxUiD156FRz8N3m9GpSMro8tvv0oHV FsRNs+JtaV+SYSk0LZz1BhffrHIo+3bz7LG7uYz9E28YtpcN+wlgTgXRAvnk/fAr WA/KQ+dJiVqBNXO3UhBNj9UrmQh4bMG6TEheN/DHHtm3Ebesi29LVIH0inl+JJRX zNo86mjh/7tIMp96b/qagL7HXgZI/PHao1af60jaHwFZBeto7g55L8H2+OsrCiAW xGjmFMZzedra3K5fZ/6/vZmm6KFacMeBJ6kB1xfdSiWX+Vmu+4w= =UBhg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----