[openpgp] Re: on discarding Literal Data Packet metadata [ was: Analysis document]
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10 Jul 2025, at 22:05, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu 2025-07-10 15:58:02 +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote: >> it is intended to provide a drop-in replacement for those workflows >> that currently rely on them. > > Can you (or anyone following this discussion) identify such a workflow? > I'm asking literally, not rhetorically. We should be developing the > protocol based on at least reasonably well-understood use cases. The best I can do is this mail from Nickolay [1]. I think the only person who can definitively answer this is someone who uses the library he references. I doubt we will ever get such an answer though... A [1] https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/librepgp-discuss/2024/000019.html _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmhyL1MACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZilGsg/+Kok6hNou8stWyvn+MAJCIW9c9JEFFR7kQQfNSF4dpN106+40vODWo/kG XQchXj2FAcIyC1bu6tMcLtY3EAbZmrMMB96ygWac1d+QJYxELHAKIPVsJtwAAURZ nQuzANx1B8hcoAmxD0YqD4hrwFci4FxiyCX/B4vAEuL3jYAHWAVc1ag8lPf81WP0 lucE1pQoYeL5WIRDOjQHlgINNjrJ7GsiqoNYKwH41dTVfH2kVX+uH4+W/KvZUQ1b yh+pWXKd4ODln2PprVQeS0Fy84to/kwuKLZqyi34hO21mf1xxZbiKdgYNDtBZED2 gcORNVaS5D1bLTZb2drPIicREhjj87JttLu1eHb9a9/qQUzDjmXiCwF+VmAahR3g 6PfV2aOqIcpU9TkxjZiaQRiQZwCHyPYdvQe6/ERMA0m8y476JXSptOe5WdeloeZ/ kfOI4lhu8x/eRYxkInGspiUDkSfKADYBZiFcU4JesDgth1QuBpOhDzN4rlbardgV rBwWC9cs6x6J48/NFOPOH6VQG5i+bcgQ5yV41WEDT9X6gOp5OhatfVZiEVky3PaC cTWg6pWUw0HfwPlg2QkJLcRtUf44BFpjHSjtqw+b42fs0fKcEbrUR+x0zjiAsCQq ID66GyEnYJbnERTAMiqJDNYEutrv5kA3QjriZHu4iwZSlCa1VjY= =kbHG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----