[openpgp] Re: Persistent Symmetric Keys: new algorithms or new packets?
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23 Jul 2025, at 14:15, Justus Winter <[email protected]> wrote: > So making persistent symmetric keys less similarly-shaped than other > keys has the advantage that we can now say: this is a persistent > symmetric key, and if you want to use it with PKESKs or Signatures to > either create or consume them, you will need to use this other interface > to do that. I.e. we can avoid shoehorning the new semantics into the > old interface. It also makes the registries semantically cleaner - we’re not creating fake “asymmetric” algorithm codepoints that replicate existing codepoints in the symmetric registry... A _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmiA5fIACgkQXB7EBNWQ Zilyvw/9EIv8MVlL8Juh+N/MksLOV8FYAYgWg7CuoJbZW0QmS6tw3v7SL8FrOZMK mvnuCV72FSifEeQlAeTjwQUJQdpUav0B+ftlC2b6IcxCJVXD7Cvcwfc4MOSoq2bG FougcYDUhP2A46dd29DcpG6gmYt4oNnxHzwX88NsadcPaE8WpWM/QDWQ7rbD1QzB RWJJE0bJbY4HvjXIImReeNxIvgHax95tudYnOuURRS0leMCs2bjBH4j9/wlZTvfB vreMx6tG9sOnkz6RTDbeR2MdUnytx/O/rakTi+iu60lbBEjmMdPWV7uj1mIO4rNA O2d90Gvpuj6cc8omSi1tXfyaph/ZP5sfYA67Jz6ONyXJMfMgHvrITESTG2mxl4pk PjoL8zuYtOz19Vd0xxJpLmUAmHi4j63Aafb3sor/dM7+pWRXlEMQBjfmoa8oYe+Y w3UM7HnYRlla1LUqqI7SOobvJ7vspk8kkbNUrH6tpohvyyh7joaRbJgjRE8kRvfy DIOoPkt6S34Hs30hEcA54o9X38SJzSP8ZR7etD3Fq/66+YVtN+33tyXpsRJWEzM8 tGc5oJYUa8gsV65iibf1XAgFKGxN3DrUH4djRGcrVm85OVJ/oeW3UVqjMc+E5W+F EcG0QudHYEGi5jAWNNO7pUk+lgdTouFyq8ff/ep4giIWaq2DWaY= =oCr4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----