[openpgp] Re: Analysis document
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu 2025-07-24 15:31:02 +0200, Falko Strenzke wrote:
> I think in order to have clear instructions for the implementation of
> the verification, an erratum would be useful. But I'm not really
> requesting it, I'm only trying to explain how we came to classify this
> in our document as a potential security issue. If I can help with/by
> filing an erratum I will happily do.
I'm still not clear how to read 9580 as mandating a re-encoding. If you
think the text could be clearer, please do file an erratum!
--dkg
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]