[openpgp] Re: Algorithms vs packets in forwarding and PSK

Heiko Schäfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Falko, list,

>> The current draft doesn't allow public key packets to be used with 
>> persistent symmetric key algorithms at all, since there isn't any use 
>> for them. Do you think that should change?
>>
> It doesn't? Then I don't understand Table 1 
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-persistent-symmetric-keys-01.html#table-1> 
> and the subsequent passage 
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-persistent-symmetric-keys-01.html#section-5-5>:
>
> "/As the secret key material is required for all cryptographic 
> operations with symmetric keys, implementations SHOULD NOT use 
> symmetric algorithm IDs in Public-Key Packets or Public-Subkey Packets/"
>
> It's declared "SHOULD NOT" and not "MUST NOT". What do I misread?
>

I consider this "SHOULD NOT" a mistake, and think this should say "MUST 
NOT".

Heiko

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.