[openpgp] Re: OpenPGP WG next steps discussion
Andrew Gallagher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 Sep 2025, at 10:41, Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > The extension would convey to a recipient that the signature was > committed to some log, and the recipient can also verify > cryptographically this claim. The extension would carry some > information that can be chained back to the transparency log. A trivial implementation of this would be a Merkle tree construction where each signature in the chain contained a notation subpacket that referenced the previous signature. The log itself could then be any database that is indexable by the reference IDs. A _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEKR55odxVrielLu+DXB7EBNWQZikFAmjKh0QACgkQXB7EBNWQ ZimUkw/6A/FpB6kzvhIv96ClzhaLpUHcXy+pCGMJdU1/VlAAmpqmpM0dtkSzLZx9 J87RvHEwIZ5OHi0BYLR7+XmKmalUbQIukDy1bSj4tJq7nay2cnEXNg6NltGb689G Bpr2MmUsdFL3HuLl4s/VY3qbsGTdKo3pOecNS638CLrkDZSmvOI2A4OufSXLvaoQ ZuttDttiaw34kk6sbZHZe8JI+h8yzWL/Qze8XgXraDrLQjOUHtV7ZM8SinDIPAxW ymlFuFwkt4+7gU4McWSWM3oHqu9yiiNLX1KYk2q9mFsY92bvjHQeAGTHOqVbgIc3 MeIEJzzKzFEHKMm76ocA7QluP0xckMxxQZkT0nbdleud0Ca8iG5KnSeHYlwNEwjM CbklBYzH1/YXiDzbrOL9aYo4T8rFsCvN/lUO00Wzm5NWiYeVAHV+AVyAoLv02azG z6+DqVe3RkrSaYFNqOzDXofXMJJCGWv76C35CSaKY0Z9nR0o90dZ5+RX7SXgB1LG f4dISHBRfgzZ5Z7nDvTKJYYzzgRZzeU67AT7fpmdAenm0yzXg1pU6++PGHScfOSr 2PyGIGblJkLf8L6SI1aO1rD3ZV25fboXeiTAfk9/FqrZSWDAnS703USXSg175FHx wVuQNyfIHV84lnzZ2rEEkCeX1VN5duMKL36njuoNKYKZYcuBvDI= =WWd6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----