[openpgp] Re: OpenPGP WG next steps discussion

Hi Simon,

On Wednesday, September 17th, 2025 at 11:41, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Interesting, although if I'm not mistaken that is about key transparency
> and not about transparency logging of signatures?

Ah, I see, I did misunderstand the topic you're interested in, yeah.

> Are you (or someone else) also interested in how to commit a PGP
> signature into a transparency log, and store the transparency chain
> commitment in a PGP extension?

It sounds like an interesting use case but we're not as much involved
with the use of OpenPGP for software signing.

Defining a signature notation for this could be sensible, and could be
done even without much WG involvement:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9580.html#name-notation-data

Best,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]