[openpgp] Re: PQC composite sig context string? [was: Re: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-12]

Heiko Schäfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.openpgp
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Daniel, list,

On 9/24/25 6:53 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> WG, we need to make a decision between these two choices:
>
> A) Retain the old consensus (and move forward with the draft and test
>      vectors as planned, perhaps noting in the draft the historical
>      reason for the empty context string), or
>
> B) Select a context string (invalidating existing test vectors and
>       implementation branches)
>
> Please give feedback on the list here about whether you prefer A or B.

I also prefer A.

I think the concrete benefit of moving forward with this draft and 
getting it deployed, clearly outweighs any potential benefits that B 
might have (which the WG already decided were acceptable to forego, in 
the past).

Thanks, regards,
Heiko

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.