[openpgp] Re: PQC composite sig context string? [was: Re: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-12]
Heiko Schäfer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.openpgp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Daniel, list, On 9/24/25 6:53 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > WG, we need to make a decision between these two choices: > > A) Retain the old consensus (and move forward with the draft and test > vectors as planned, perhaps noting in the draft the historical > reason for the empty context string), or > > B) Select a context string (invalidating existing test vectors and > implementation branches) > > Please give feedback on the list here about whether you prefer A or B. I also prefer A. I think the concrete benefit of moving forward with this draft and getting it deployed, clearly outweighs any potential benefits that B might have (which the WG already decided were acceptable to forego, in the past). Thanks, regards, Heiko _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]